by Grant Gochin
Eight days before Artur Fridman’s next hearing, Lithuania’s state history center should disclose the research behind any historical premise used against him.
The next hearing in the criminal case against Artur Fridman is scheduled for August 26. He is innocent, and the prosecution against him is illegitimate. Before the Vilnius City District Court hears more historical evidence, Lithuania should answer a simpler question: what research file, if any, supports the state history being carried into the case?
The prosecution began with a Facebook post. On May 9, 2024, Fridman stood at Antakalnis Cemetery in Vilnius to honor his grandfather Aron Fridman, a Jewish soldier who fought Nazi Germany in the Red Army. He wrote about Soviet victory, Lithuanian partisans, and Lithuania’s heroization of Adolfas Ramanauskas-Vanagas. Algirdas Ramanauskas filed a complaint with the Vilnius Regional Prosecutor’s Office on July 16, 2024. On January 8, 2025, authorities imposed a written undertaking restricting Fridman from leaving Lithuania. On October 30, 2025, prosecutor Kristina Minko signed charges in Criminal Case No. 02-2-00512-24 under Criminal Code Articles 170² §1 and 313 §2. The formal indictment runs twelve pages; the broader pre-trial file runs to roughly 220. The Vilnius City District Court opened the trial on March 5, 2026.


















